"In the beginning God created heaven and earth. Now the earth was a formless void, there was darkness over the deep, with a divine wind sweeping over the waters. God said, "Let there be light," and there was light. God saw that light was good, and God divided light from darkness. God called light "day", and darkness he called "night". Evening came and morning came: the first day. "(Genesis 1:1-5).
Let's observe carefully what this
first paragraph tells us.
In this description, I clearly distinguish the original chaos nebula of cosmic
dust that science mentions. A "sea" of dust, for someone who may be watching in
in the darkness, and who does not have the slightest idea that what he is
witnessing is not water but a nebula in which he (our possible observer) is "floating".
This individual is in the place, in the exact place, in which hundreds of
millions of years later the Earth in formation will be located. Moreover, as he
is not yet on solid ground all he can discern or understand, according to its
parameters, is the abyss, the abyss of space.
Then, this same individual (who continues his observation and narrates what he
sees) perceives that the light shines for the first time and believes that God
at that precise moment has created it -the light- as he still cannot see that it
is the sun that originates the light. He sees the light, but not where it comes
from. For him it is as if God had "switched on" the light.
Then we face the first major dilemma typical of Genesis: how light can be
created before the stars? (This obviously rhetorical question is usually
accompanied by some skeptical gesture, knowing boastful look and intent to end
the conversation). Yes, it is true, it cannot be, but -there is always a but-
what if we placed the viewer in the exact location where the primordial swirl
was, the one which will lead to our planet? It is obvious that our observer
could have seen the light, but would have been unable to know where that light
had come from, because -as noted earlier- the "dust storm" would have prevented
it. Also, as he would be "standing" on the swirling, he would perceive the
passage of day-night, light-darkness, due to its rotation. This person -because
he'd be standing, situated, on the swirling- would turn with him, and therefore,
a moment he would be facing the light, and the next, he would have his back to
it.
Here, we can already realize that it is essential, fundamental, the existence of
an observer and -even more-its location, in order to understand the Genesis...